Kuasa Hukum Prabowo-Gibran: Dalil Permohonan dalam Sengketa Pilpres Tidak Terbukti
Kuasa hukum dari pihak Prabowo Subianto-Gibran Rakabuming, Hotman Paris, recently stated that the arguments presented by the petitioners in the presidential election dispute were not proven. Hotman Paris assessed that the allegations made by the petitioners’ legal team were not balanced compared to the respondents’ side.
The legal team representing Prabowo-Gibran is reinforced by a team of renowned lawyers, while the pairs Anies Baswedan-Muhaimin Iskandar and Ganjar-Mahfud only have a few lawyers. Hotman Paris commented that the defense presented by the petitioners’ legal team was flawed and inaccurate. He also stated that the defense lacked substance and failed to prove the arguments presented.
Hotman Paris expressed his surprise that illegal actions were proven by a psychologist and Romo Magnis-Suseno. He warned the petitioners not to cry if they lose in the presidential election dispute. This statement comes amidst the ongoing legal battle regarding the results of the 2024 presidential election, reflecting the intensity and high stakes involved in the process.
The dispute over the election results has captured the attention of the nation, with both sides fiercely defending their positions. The outcome of this legal battle will have significant implications for the future of the country. As the proceedings continue, all eyes are on the legal teams representing the parties involved, as they navigate the complexities of the legal system in pursuit of justice and resolution.
